Yesterday I critiqued the first five solar industry priorities. I should have stopped there. The remaining five are fraught with a multitude of problems. They either inaccurately portray reality, are hypocritical, or are downright disingenuous.
The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) would have been better served to focus on fewer legitimate priorities rather than to attempt to completely pander to the upcoming Trump administration. The effort to convince Trump that solar is critical to anything but combatting climate change is absurd on its face.
๐๐๐ธ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ถ๐๐๐๐ฒ, ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐บ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ด๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ธ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด?
Nonetheless, for political expediency, the industry has decided the best course of action is to jettison any reference or association with climate change and position itself as a savior of energy independence, security, and dominance. ย Ask your friendly grid operator what they think about that.
Check out todayโs satirical perspective and chime in. I would be interested in whether you agree or disagree with the industryโs most influential trade associationโs abrupt pivot.
hashtag#SEIA hashtag#solarindustry hashtag#oilandgas hashtag#oilandgasindustry hashtag#solarenergy hashtag#inflationreductionact
